Don Imus has been gone from the morning airwaves for four months now, and that national dialogue on race that the ad sales suits at CBS promised us still hasn't happened. Color me shocked. The I-Man's unwitty, cool dude wannabe "nappy-headed ho's" aside had Al Sharpton on the march, successfully demanding the morning man's job. Besides, it was one lame-ass departure for a man who claims Mort Sahl as one of his comedic role models.
Defended by the lawyer for Lenny Bruce - another I-fave - Imus came in for a six-figure settlement of his contract, but his name has entered the lexicon of race relations as roughly the synonym for "white man who is clueless about black people." There are nuances, depending on the particular edition of your dictionary. Liberals generally order up a secondary definition: "also, a racist scalawag." The conservative dictionary reads: "also, victim of a media witch hunt."
Meanwhile, WFAN here in New York replaced the Imus morning zoo (and its regular roster of Matthews, Russert, McCain et al) with a washed up lefty quarterback boasting less than half the pro resume of Ken "The Snake" Stabler, and a guy named Craig Carton - a shock jock in the Stern mode who made his jump from Triple-A on the back of such hilarious material as "Operation Cucha Gotcha," his humorous attempt to incarcerate Hispanics in the Garden State. Mort Sahl, indeed. You have to love the ethics of CBS management and "National Dialogue" Moonves.
There may be nothing on whilst I run a razor blade over my jowls each morning, but the discussion of race in a post-Imus world proceeds apace. Indeed, many are the mornings I miss the voice of the late Steve Gilliard and his fearless writing on the black-white divide, here in New York and elsewhere. I was wondering this week what Steve would have made of the extraordinary events in Jena, Louisiana, where a runaway prosecutor named Reed Walters and the local judiciary have kept a 17-year-old high school student in jail for nine months for his actions in attacking a white student after three nooses appeared on the notorious whites-only oak tree on the grounds of the local high school.
"I can be your best friend or your worst enemy," Walters told students at the school. "With a stroke of my pen, I can make your
lives disappear."
The Jena case involving black six students charged with crimes and a group of white students facing the horror of in-school suspension is every inch the miscarriage of justice that the Duke lacrosse case was, and DA Walters' actions are as bad as the disbarred and jailed Mike Nilfong. Yet, they happened on the other side of the racial divide in this country - the political divide that lets prejudice hide under the cloak of "conservatism."
So it's not surprising that wingnut bloggers like Glenn Reynolds declared a kind of hands-off policy toward the debate over Jena (wait till all the facts come out), while others fell into paroxyms indignation over the appearance of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson down south. Michele Malkin: "I’m not going to join the knee-jerk race-hustlers in celebrating the
“civil right” to beat white people unconscious to rectify institutional
racism. Is this the legacy Martin Luther King, Jr., would have
sanctioned?"
The insane over-charging of a minor as an adult with attempted murder (carrying a minimum sentence in Louisiana of 20 years) in an incident where the victim attended his class ring ceremony the same night did indeed have the "knee-jerk race-hustlers" out by the thousands in the streets of Jena, where letters defending the town as preserving a way of life from the 1950s are presented on the municipal website without a hint of irony. But that cluelessness (to be kind) or willing blindness (to be accurate) is endemic of at least half of the American political landscape.
In other words, Malkin's knee jerked alright - and just the way conservatives tend to flex those particular tendons when race is the topic.
It's 2007 and the gap between black and white on the right side of the political blotter couldn't be wider or more apparent. Witness the surprise registered by Bill O'Reilly when he visited a restaurant in Harlem and realized he wouldn't be accosted by thugs and subjected to gang rules.
"And I couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference
between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City.
I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks,
primarily black patronship. It was the same, and that's really what
this society's all about now here in the U.S.A. There's no difference.
There's no difference. There may be a cultural entertainment -- people
may gravitate toward different cultural entertainment, but you go down
to Little Italy, and you're gonna have that. It has nothing to do with
the color of anybody's skin... That's right. There wasn't one person in Sylvia's who was screaming, 'M-Fer, I want more iced tea.'"
Apparently, that fear is what's keeping the major Republican presidential candidates from attending a debate moderated by the wildly popular mainstream talk show host Tavis Smiley - who has never been reported to have shouted "more iced tea, mofo!" to anyone - at historically black Morgan State University this week. John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson all snubbed Smiley and the debate will go on with the five lesser GOP hopefuls, a development that had the likes of Newt Gingrich decrying the snub as a "terrible mistake."
I think Smiley's reaction to the empty chairs he'll face at Morgan State was unblinking and correct:
"No person, black, white, or brown, Democrat or Republican, male or
female, no person should be elected president in 2008 without speaking
to communities of color."
And that's because race is still a problem in these United States, and too few of us want to face up to it. It tinges the national debate on immigration, it brands a scar of prejudice on law enforcement policy, and it clearly taints this administration's greatest domestic failure.
Imus has become a verb, but I for one would have been very interested to hear an honest discussion of race from a prominent - if humbled - white man's point of view. Sometimes humor unleashes more honesty than endless talking heads stacked end to end. Some of the material Larry David has used on Curb Your Enthusiasm, in particular, does the job of shining a light on a cultural gap many liberals would rather wish away into the past. David plays himself as a clueless, rich, white guy stumbling through an almost alternative cultural landscape whenever he meets someone with brown skin. It is hilarious, almost without exception.
But it also portrays a cultural divide - one that allows some Americans to wear Confederate flags without community censure - that we all ignore at our peril.